Share this post

user icon

Live

People Reading

This story now

Reason Behind The Outcast Of Mistry From Tata Sons Revealed

The newspapers and the news sites have been majorly occupied with the ongoing rift between Cyrus Mistry and Ratan Tata. The latter who returned this week to the helm of India's largest conglomerate is searching for a partner who could buy the stake of Tata Sons held by the family of Cyrus Mistry. Where it is said that Mistry's family doesn't plan to sell out its holdings.

There is news of every step going on since the dispute started and here is the new addition where Ratan Tata has revealed the reasons for the rift.

Recommended for you!

Reason Behind The Outcast Of Mistry From Tata Sons Revealed

Reason Behind The Outcast Of Mistry From Tata Sons Revealed

754 396
  in Desi

Mistry has been accused of repeated departures from the group's ethos.

Mistry has been accused of repeated departures from the group's ethos.

Sources from Tata Sons said...

Sources from Tata Sons said...

"The Tata Sons board gives its Chairman complete autonomy to manage opportunities and challenges," to which Mistry failed to comply with.

Tata Sons had been silent on this topic since Monday but however spoke openly over it on Thursday.

Tata Sons had been silent on this topic since Monday but however spoke openly over it on Thursday.

The Directors of Tata Sons had repeated issues concerned with growing trust deficits.

The Directors of Tata Sons had repeated issues concerned with growing trust deficits.

But the queries were not being addressed.

But the queries were not being addressed.

In an email to the board, it was revealed about Mistry...

In an email to the board, it was revealed about Mistry...

That he had been warned of Rs 1.18 trillion writedowns, over time, from five unprofitable businesses.

Where Cyrus had questioned various decisions taken prior to his tenure.

Where Cyrus had questioned various decisions taken prior to his tenure.

The questions raised were such as Tata's entry into civil aviation, aggressive bidding for the Mundra Power Project, and the conglomerate's persistence with the Nano, which bled the passenger vehicle division of Tata Motors Ltd.

Mistry said, he was writing the email.

Mistry said, he was writing the email.

"To emphasize the total lack of corporate governance and to point out the failure on the part of the directors to discharge the fiduciary duty owed to stakeholders of Tata Sons and the group companies."

To which Tata Sons statement came...

To which Tata Sons statement came...

"It's unfortunate that it is only for his removal that allegations and misrepresentation of facts are being made about business decisions that the former chairman was party to for over a decade in different capacities."

It is said that some statements by Mistry were selective and convenient.

It is said that some statements by Mistry were selective and convenient.

This does not represent the true state of affairs.

As per Shriram Subramanian, founder, and managing director, InGovern Research Services, that Tata Sons are trying to anticipate any legal actions.

Whose statement did you find more closer to truth?

others like

Loved this? Spread it out then

comments Comment ()

Post as @guest useror
clear

clear
arrow_back

redo Pooja query_builder {{childComment.timeAgo}}

clear

clear
arrow_back

Be the first to comment on this story.

Report

close

Select you are Reporting

expand_more
  • +2351 Active user
Post as @guest useror

NSFW Content Ahead

To access this content, confirm your age by signing up.